I am SO SICK of how everyone "LUVs" Southworst, er, west, airline, and thinks SWA loves them. These people obviously either don't care about anyone fat who flies, or are unaware of SWA's anti-fat policies. As I understand it:
- They require anyone who needs a seatbelt extender to buy two seats, whether the plane is full or not.
- They may or may not refund the 2nd seat purchase if the plane is not full.
- The arbitrary application of this policy is at the "discretion" (degree of fat prejudice) of individual ticket and gate agents.
- This policy can be enacted anywhere along a multi-flight journey.
- They don't guarantee the two seats you purchase will be next to each other.
- They don't give you double luggage allowance.
I have only once flown SWA -- before they instituted this policy. Never again. (I prefer Jet Blue.) So if you are a person of size and have experience with SWA's anti-fat policy, I really want to hear from you -- did I miss anything? What was it like for you? Did you find SWA to be "loving" toward you?
Adam Kayce (Monk at Work), a teacher I otherwise adore and respect, just posted in his blog about how he "LUVs" Southwest airlines. Someone from SWA responded, so they're reading the blog.
So here's an opportunity to educate Adam and his readers about how Southworst's "loving attitude" does not apply to fat people. Please post a reply to Adam's blog if you agree.
(Oh, for those of us attending NAAFA and/or ASDAH conferences, he also mentions a GREAT Indian restaurant right nearby.... yum! Who wants to join me there?)
AmpleHugs,
Anne
Hi Anne,
Put me down for the "totally unaware" category. It's just not something I've ever encountered, personally, so it has been invisible to me.
And, by the way, I don't think Brian Lusk reads my blog at all; my guess is that he saw that I'd linked to them, and came to respond.
So, I'm happy to have more conversation about this on my blog, but his blog is the one where the comments should go — these days, companies are wising up and listening to their customers more than ever. If you've got a beef with them (and obviously, you do), let them know.
You never know what kinds of changes you could enact.
Posted by: Adam Kayce : Monk At Work | May 28, 2007 at 08:57 AM
Thank you, Adam, for hearing me and the others who posted to your blog.
You make a good point, and I encourage anyone who feels that fat bigotry has no place in businesses meant to serve everyone, to let your feeling be known on Southworst's blog: http://www.blogsouthwest.com/
As Adam says -- you never know what changes... after all, we people of size are the majority of the U.S. population -- let us not be so silent.
AmpleHugs,
Anne
Posted by: Anne | May 28, 2007 at 09:12 AM
I totally disagree that SWA's policy is bad. I am a very large woman, and at first I was totally outraged by SWA's policy. I also avoided flying them. However, flying within California can make that difficult.
So, I tried Southwest again...this time not fighting their policy. I purchase 2 tickets ahead of time (thus avoiding any embarrassment at the airport of having a gate agent suggesting it to me). When I check in, I get a card that says, "Seat Reserved" for me to put in the seat next to me. Again, with the card, I don't have to explain anything to passengers finding a seat on the plane (no embarrassment). Finally, purchasing two seats grants me pre-boarding privileges so I can get a second seat without any issues. I LOVE not standing in line A, B or C and wondering if I'll be stuck in a middle seat.
The best part about Southwest's policy is that they will refund the second seat if they are not full. The only time they keep the second fare is when they have standbys who didn't get on because you purchased a second seat. If the flight is full but they didn't turn anyone away from the flight, they will still refund your second fare. Now, I do have to call Southwest after the flight is over to get this refund, but to me it is fine because I know I have flown in comfort.
I purposefully fly on days/times when I know the flight is not likely to be full. In 4 years of flying Southwest regularly, I have only had to pay the second fare (no refund) twice.
After experiencing this policy, I actually think it is the other airlines that are not serving fat people well. If I purchase a second seat on another airline, I have to pay for that seat whether the flight is full or not. I would much rather that airlines adopt a similar policy to SWA.
P.S. SWA doesn't require a second seat purchase if you ask for a seatbelt extension...only if you can't comfortably fit in the seat with the armrest down.
Posted by: Kari | Oct 24, 2007 at 05:26 PM
Thank you, Kari, for sharing your experience and your perspective.
I agree that if one must purchase a second seat, it's good to be assured those two seats will be next to each other (which is not always so on other airlines), and, that you can get a refund if the flight was not full. If SWA is truly as consistent and non-arbitrary in their policy, then perhaps my stance needs softening.
However:
1) I have not flown them in many years, and the reports I hear from others is that SWA is quite arbitrary and not as consistent as you indicate.
2) I maintain that public transportation should serve people of all shapes and sizes by design; there should be seating that accommodates extra-tall people as well as extra-wide people, just as some modes of transport now have seating (at no special charge) to accommodate people of limited mobility.
Posted by: Coach Anne | Oct 24, 2007 at 07:00 PM
Sign me up for some of that 'extra-tall seating' - most airplanes are painfully built for folks like me (and I'm only 6'4", which is "just getting started" in the tall people section).
I did get bumped to first class once because of it, though... a sympathetic (and probably 5'11" herself) flight attendant gave me an upgrade because she felt sorry for me!
Posted by: Adam Kayce : Monk At Work | Oct 25, 2007 at 07:54 AM
Thank you for sharing your experience and your perspective.it's really good.
Posted by: daisy | Nov 13, 2007 at 01:33 AM
I absolutely disagree with SWA's policy. It is a discriminatory policy to overweight people. If that's the case, how about half price for very thin people? It sounds ridiculous? I saw a topic about it on pluscupid.com forums. All people on the site hate this policy.
Posted by: Rose | Dec 02, 2007 at 10:08 PM
I had a very embarrasing occurance yesterday in harlingen where an airline representative approached me in the lounge and pulled me aside to ask me if I could fit comfortably in a seat. I was mortified. Do they charge 1/2 price for children? I was with a co-worker and was seriously traumatized.
Posted by: MM | May 22, 2010 at 11:00 AM
So sorry you had this experience, MM. No matter where on the validity<-->bigotry spectrum SW's policy falls, there is no excuse for publicly humiliating and traumatizing a customer.
AmpleHugs to you,
-Anne
Posted by: coach anne | May 24, 2010 at 10:41 AM